Court Decisions

Bank of New York v. Unknown Heirs & Legatees, 369 Ill. App. 3d 472, 476 (2006).
The process server's efforts must be more than "casual, routine, or spiritless."
For more info click here
City of Chicago v. Leakas, 6ILL. App. 3d 20, 27, (1972)
The law "requires an honest and well-directed effort to ascertain the whereabouts of a defendant by an inquiry as full as circumstances can permit"
For more info click here
Edward Hines Lumber Co. v. Smith, 29 Ill. App 2d 35 (2nd Dist. 1961)
If the person of the defendant's family at the abode refuses service, the server may leave the papers on the door, which will effect substitute service on that person.
For more info click here
Freund Equipment, Inc. v. Fox, 301 Ill. App. 3d 163 (2nd Dist. 1998)
It is enough to identify the documents (i.e., summons and complaint), state from which court they were issued, and give the court date.
For more info click here
U.S. Bank vs. Johnston
US Bank vs Johnston.pdf
For more info click here
United Bank of Loves Park v. Dohm, 115 Ill. App. 3d 286 (2nd Dist. 1983)
What is a Defendant's "usual place of abode"
For more info click here
Tenn. Court Order Halts Process Servers
"Cerny, presiding Sessions Court judge, said he and the four other Sessions Court judges will allow private process servers to do the work. But they'll all have to apply through a procedure to get it. He's also pledging the court will watch them with a much closer eye."
For more info click here

pdf
The forms provided in Adobe Acrobat format (PDF), can be viewed using Adobe Acrobat Reader . If you do not currently have Adobe Acrobat Reader on your computer you can download it here.